Task: Write a idiota to Renault's board setting out your analysis of Schweitzer's actions great suitability from this important foreign position. Do you feel this individual should have socialized differently? Be sure to recommend a way forward.
Main Concern: As various other automotive manufacturers, Renault was facing a great overproduction problem, combined with an explanation of countrywide markets. After their prepare of early retirement of some of their workers was turned down by the France government, Renault's chairman, Paillette Schweitzer, released completely suddenly that it will reduce staff by concluding the Vilvoorde plant. As a result, 3, 95 Renault personnel and nearly 3, 500 employees in direct supply companies could loose their very own jobs in five months. In the legal point of view, the decision overlooked all legal rules and procedures relating to factory closures, such as OECD procedures, nationwide codes of conduct, and European Union and national guidelines on communautaire redundancies and works authorities rights. Relating to these polices, employees have the right to become notified just before a decision in regards to a factory closure is made and informed about the ways in which the company ideas to deal with the results for employees. Louis Schweitzer's actions provoked a real turmoil, which is asking his effectiveness as a global manager on this multinational company.
Exploration of Alternatives and Recommendations
Considering the negative impact of Schweitzer's actions on the organization image and employees morale, the following alternatives could be pursued to solve this kind of crisis: 1 . Keep him on long lasting and improve his popularity through a better communication with the Vilvoord staff; 2 . Continue to keep him just on short-term, put the Renault's management group and its function council responsible for dealing with settlement with the Vilvoord employees; 3. Fire and replace him with one other chairman appointed by the board of company directors.
General disapproval of his decision is located...